ORGANIZATIONAL SEQUENCE, TURN-TAKING, AND ROLE-SWITCHING IN A HUMAN-ROBOT COMMUNICATION

  • Anggy Fian Febriyanti Department of English Literature, Faculty of Humanities, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
  • Irham irham UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Keywords: Humanoid Communication, Organizational Sequence, Role-switching, Sophia, Turn-taking

Abstract

Research on artificial intelligence has developed rapidly since the last fifteen years. Social studies and humanities scholars including linguists has put much attention on the relation between human-robot communications from wider and multidiscipline perspectives. Nonetheless, there is only a dearth of research investigating turn, sequence, and role-switching in humanoid interaction. Focusing on Sophia, the humanoid robot, the present study aims to examine three elements of dialogic- communication related to conversation. The present study applies a descriptive qualitative approach to investigate the research subject. Data consists of forms of utterances taken from two Sophia’s video that will be categorized into a sequence of organization, turn-taking, and role-switching functions. The results  of present study show that Sophia is able to perform human-like interactional features in terms of providing adequate adjacency pairs, turn-taking, and a sequence of organizations. The present study shows that Sophia is not able to interrupt a conversation because it needs a brief moment of silence before replying.  

References

Arend, B., Sunnen, P., & Caire, P. (2017). Investigating Breakdowns in Human Robot Interaction: A conversation analysis guided single case study of a human-robot communication in a museum environment. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering, 11(5).
Breazeal, C. (1999). Robot in Society: Friend or appliance? In: 1999 Autonomous Agents Workshop on Emotion-Based Agent Architectures. Seattle, pp. 18-26.
Coates, J. (2004). Women, Men and Language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language, (third ed). Harlow: Longman.
Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot Interaction: A growing research field. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 4(1), p. 15.
Have, P. T. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis, a Practical Guide (Sec.Ed). London: Sage, p. 264.
Hill, J., Randolph, F. W., & Farreras, I. (2015). Real Conversations with Artificial Intelligence: A comparison between human–human online conversations and human–chatbot conversations. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, pp. 245-250.
Horton, W. (2017). Theories and Approaches to the Study of Conversation and Interactive Discourse. In M. Schober, The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Processes (2nd ed.). Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity.
Iman, T. R., & Winata, E. Y. (2021). Overlaps in Conversations by Speakers of Bahasa Indonesian. LINGUA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA, 17(2).

Ismaliyah, N. (2015). Conversation Analysis of Turn Taking Mechanism in Piers Morgan Tonight Talk Show. Malang: UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Itakura, H. (2001). Describing Conversational Dominance. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(12), pp. 1859-1880.
Jennyfer, A. (2005). An Analysis of Turn-taking Irregularities Uttered by African American Characters in the Movie "Why Do Fools Fall in Love". Bachelor thesis, Petra Christian University.
Jufadri. (2018). Turn Taking Strategies Used by David Bechkam and the Host in ‘Google’ Talk Show. Malang: UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Kose-Bagci, H., Dautenhahn, K., & Nehaniv, C. L. (2008). Emergent Dynamics of Turn-Taking Interaction in Drumming Games with a Humanoid Robot. In: 17th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication RO-MAN 2008. Munich: IEEE, pp. 346–353.
Lee, M. & Makatchev, M. (2009). How Do People Talk with a Robot?: An analysis of human-robot dialogues in the real world. In: 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston: ACM, pp. 3769-3774.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(JUN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731

Liddicoat, A. (2007). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.
Lincoln, Yvonna S. & Guba, Egon G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. California: Sage Publications.
Logue, D., & Stivers, T. (2012). Squawk in Interaction: A primer of conversation analysis for students of animal communication. Journal of Behaviour, 149(13-14), pp. 1283-1298.
Martinez, C. B. (2018). Cross-Cultural Analysis of Turn-Taking Practices in English and Spanish Conversations. Vernacular: New Connections in Language, Literature, & Culture, 3(5), pp. 1-21.
Mavridis, N. (2015). A Review of Verbal and Non-Verbal Human–Robot Interactive Communication. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 63, pp. 22–35.
McShane, M., & Nirenburg, S. (2021). Linguistics for the Age of AI. In Linguistics for the Age of AI. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13618.001.0001
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747


Schild, J. (2022, August 25). When and How Will AI Truly Understand Human Language? Is It Possible? UNITED LANGUAGE GROUP .

Mey, J. L. (1993). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
Mirning, N., et al. (2013). Face-To-Face with a Robot: What do we actually talk about? International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 10(01), pp. 1-23.
Mutlu, B., Shiwa, T., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2009). Footing in Human-Robot Conversations: How robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues. In: 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction - HRI ’09. NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Nomura, T. (2017). Robots and Gender. Gender and the Genome, 1(1), pp. 18–26.
Pelikan, H. (2015). How Humans Adapt to a Robot Recipient: An interaction analysis perspective on human-robot interaction. Northwest Germany: University of Osnabrück.
Person, R. (1996). In Conversation with Jonah. Sheffield: Sheffield Acad. Press.
Sacks, H. (1967). The Search for Help: No one to turn to. In Essays in self destruction (E.S. Shneidman, ed.). New York: Science House, pp. 203-23.
Sacks, et al. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking in Conversation. Language, 50, pp. 696-735.
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on Conversation (2 Vols.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Schegloff, E. (1992). Introduction. In Harvey Sacks, Lectures on Conversation, (Vol.1: Fall 1964–Spring 1968). Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction. Vol. 1; A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sidner, C. L., Lee, C., Morency, L.-P., & Forlines, C. (2006). The Effect of Head-Nod Recognition in Human-Robot Conversation. In: 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ’06. NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Sievers, C., & Gruber, T. (2016). Reference in Human and Non-Human Primate Communication: What does it take to refer? Journal of Animal Cognition, 19(4), pp. 759–768.
Thomaz, A. L., & Chao, C. (2011). Turn-Taking Based on Information Flow for Fluent Human-Robot Interaction. AI Magazine, 32(4), 53.
VanderStoep, S. W., & Johnson, D. D. (2008). Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. New Jersey: Wiley.
Wardhaugh, R. (1991). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Published
2022-09-12